, z is not applicable, 0 is null and ~ is less than half the smallest unit displayed. The government says the cut to the foreign aid budget save will save around 4bn a year. The difference is due to official loan reflows not being included under the grant equivalent measure. The report released on Saturday, October 29 says that is because a large percentage of the money set aside for aid is being spent on housing and supporting refugees. Figure 12 provides an overview of bilateral ODA by major sector in 2019, compared against 2018 spend. Multisector/Cross-Cutting - 1,325 million (12.9%). Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia,[c] officially the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA),[d] is a country on the Arabian Peninsula in Western Asia. Accordingly, they enable individual donor governments, such as the UK, to support development and humanitarian work in a wider range of countries. The relatively larger increase in the level of ODA in 2016 (by 1.2bn) reflects the switch to the European System of Accounts (ESA) 2010 methodology for measuring GNI and the consequent increase in UK ODA to meet the 0.7% ODA commitment on that basis. UK foreign aid spending in 2021/22. Ukrainian troops have liberated nearly 30,000 square miles of their territory from Russian forces since the invasion began on Feb. 24, 2022, but Putin appears to be . Publication of the FCDO's monthly programme data will resume as soon as the system changes have completed. We will be reaching out to users via the Statistics at FCDO page to help us plan future developments and meet users analytical needs as far as possible. For example, Afghanistan in 2018 was in 4th position, and in 2019 is in 3rd position (a change of +1). Figure 18 legend: Top 15 recipient countries of total ODA from the DAC donor countries in 2018 and the UKs share of ODA in these recipient countries (orange) compared to other DAC countries ODA share (blue). Figures for DAC donors final 2019 ODA will be published in December. The introduction of the grant-equivalent[footnote 24] measure in 2018 primarily affects countries with a high proportion of loans in their 2019 ODA portfolio. Canada - Unlike other countries, Canada has taken a unique feminist approach. Spend increased by 56 million on 2018 to 207 million in 2019. Figure 17 legend: ODA spend in terms of GNI comparing 2018 and 2019 spend for each DAC donor country (ODA:GNI ratio). Multilateral Aid: When multiple governments pool resources in cooperation with organizations like the World Bank, the IMF, and the UN. Figure 3 legend: A) Percentage of UK ODA spend by DFID, Other Government Departments (OGDs) and Other UK Contributors (Other Contributors) in 2015 (dark blue), 2018 (light blue) and 2019 (grey). It will take only 2 minutes to fill in. UK bilateral ODA spend was 9,533 million (65.8% of total UK . Figure 1: UK ODA levels ( billions) and ODA:GNI ratios (%), 1970 - 2019. Tied Aid: The receiving country accepts aid with the expectation that it is spent in the lending country. This was an increase of 101 million compared to 2018. DEFRAs ODA spend delivers against international climate, biodiversity and development objectives. Total bilateral aid commitments to Ukraine 2022-2023, by country and type. It covers the total amount of UK ODA spent in 2019, the calculation of the ODA:GNI ratio, longer-term spending trends, breakdowns of UK ODA spend by main delivery channel, and by Government Departments and other contributors. These shares should be taken as indicative estimates rather than exact amounts of funding, and they are dependent upon multilateral organisations returning disbursement data to the DAC. . The FCO ODA programmes concentrated on the strategic objectives of promoting global prosperity, and strengthening global peace, security and governance. Well send you a link to a feedback form. The House of Lords will hold a debate on the subject on 15 December 2022. The estimate for the UKs share of the EU ODA budget in 2019 is 983 million compared to 951 million in 2018. First, total Russian net ODA disbursements nearly quadrupled from US$231 million in 2010 to US$902 million in 2015 (in constant 2015 dollars). IDA was replaced as the largest recipient of UK multilateral ODA by the UKs share of the EUs Development budget (referred to as EU attribution). For comparability, UK ODA data by recipient countries is also for 2018. Overall there has been a steady increase in the amount of UK ODA since 1970, with a spike in 2005 and 2006 which was driven by high levels of debt relief[footnote 2], and then a steep increase in 2013 (by 2.6 bn) when the UK Government first met the 0.7% ODA:GNI commitment. There are 2 cross-government funds, the Conflict, Stability and Security Fund (CSSF) and the Cross-Government Prosperity Fund. This memorandum surveys U.S. economic sanctions and anti-money laundering ("AML") developments and trends in 2022 and provides an outlook for 2023. The FY 2021 Congressional Budget Justification describes the funding required for State and USAID to carry out our missions worldwide. For more information please see the Grant Equivalent Technical note. Figure 3: Breakdown of UK ODA by contributor (2015, 2018 and 2019). A project title and description are also provided. Figure 13: Bilateral ODA by Government Department and Major Sector, 2019. The CSSF is able to respond both to evolving security threats and unforeseen crises. For the departmental breakdown see Table 4b. The UK government has been signed up to the target since 1974, but reached it for the first . The 5 largest sectors for bilateral spend in 2019 were: Figure 12: Bilateral ODA by major sector, 2018 & 2019. This was an increase of 211 million (or 1.9%) compared with 2018, ODA spend by departments other than DFID and other contributors of UK ODA was 4,090 million in 2019, an increase of 434 million, or 11.9%, on 2018, Africa remained the largest recipient of UK region-specific bilateral ODA in 2019 accounting for 50.6%, the top 3 recipients of UK bilateral country specific ODA were Pakistan (305m), Ethiopia (300m) and Afghanistan (292m), UK bilateral ODA to Yemen was 260 million, an increase of 94 million compared to 2018 - this was the largest increase to any country in 2019, the largest amount of bilateral ODA was focused on Humanitarian Aid (1,536m), Health (1,431m) and Multisector/ Cross-Cutting (1,325m) sectors. Major sectors are ordered from top to bottom by largest 2019 ODA spend. Note that provisional 2019 spend from other DAC donors is used in this chart. Figure 4 legend: UK bilateral ODA by receiving region ( millions), 2009 2019. It supports them to deal with the impacts of climate change by building their capacity to act themselves and by catalysing large scale public and private finance investments. Since 1970, the UN has set a target for donor countries to contribute 0.7% of their GNI to foreign aid. On 28 August, the ODA statistics team published a note on the Gross Public Expenditure statistics (GPEX). The Prime Minister will walk into the G7 summit as the only leader who is cutting development aid to the world's poorest. Dark blue = LDCs/Other LICs (Least Developed Countries/Other Low Income Countries), light blue = LMICs (Lower Middle Income Countries), grey = UMICs (Upper Middle Income Countries). , Frontline Diplomatic Activity (FDA) costs are administrative costs of core programme and operational delivery in or in favour of DAC-listed recipient countries that meet the primary ODA purpose. See SID 2018 p.35 case study for more information on Developing Country Unspecified spend. The analysis in this chapter is based on provisional[footnote 21] 2019 ODA data from all 29 Development Assistance Committee (DAC) member countries[footnote 22] except the UK, for which final 2019 ODA data is used. However, to provide an indication of the destination and sector of UK multilateral ODA, overall percentages of ODA disbursements by the relevant multilateral organisations are used to impute a UK estimate. In 2019, UK bilateral ODA received by Afghanistan increased compared with 2018 to 292 million (an increase of 43m) (Figure 6). This was the largest year-on-year increase compared to the other income groups, 43.0% of spend within this category consists of project-type interventions and includes expenditure on multi-country or multi-region projects. In dark blue is the 2019 ODA:GNI ratio and in grey is 2018 ratio. FCDO is responsible for collating data and reporting spend on ODA to the Organisation of Economic Development and Co-operation (OECD), including the 0.7% ODA:GNI ratio commitment. It has frequently been the top spend area in previous years, but in 2018 Humanitarian Aid was the third largest sector, after Health and Multisector/Cross-cutting. 3. It also provides small grants to organisations based in Wales to promote development awareness. The UK commitment to spend 0.7% of Gross National Income (GNI) on ODA is reported the year following the spend based on confirmed ODA outturn and GNI estimates published by the Office for National Statistics. The U.S. provides aid to countries that are recovering from war, developing countries, and countries that are strategically important to the U.S. For information on the work of the UK Statistics Authority visit: https://www.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/. in 2020, UK Official Development Assistance (ODA) spend was 14,479 million, a decrease of 698 million (4.6 % decrease) on 2019. 2019: Bilateral ODA to Africa increased by 125 million from 2,863 million in 2018 to 2,989 million in 2019, increasing by 4.4% (Figure 4). C. Other = Other contributors of UK ODA, Scottish Government, Other In-Donor Refugee Costs, Colonial Pensions administered by DFID and Welsh Government. This is an increase of 5 million from last year, with Fiji being the largest country specific recipient. Almost 25% of that budget has gone to just ten countries: Ethiopia ($1.13 billion) Jordan ($1.03 billion) Afghanistan . The figure presented for the Welsh Assembly Government represents their estimated spend for the financial year 2019/20 and are used as a proxy for their calendar year 2019 spend. For more information please see the published note which outlines a new approach in more detail and provides an opportunity for users to give feedback. Dark blue = LDCs/Other LICs (Least Developed Countries/Other Low Income Countries), light blue = LMICs (Lower Middle Income Countries), grey = UMICs (Upper Middle Income Countries). Within Health, the top three spending areas in 2019 were Medical Research (339m), Family Planning (252m) and Infectious Disease Control (182m). News stories, speeches, letters and notices, Reports, analysis and official statistics, Data, Freedom of Information releases and corporate reports. II. Japan has publicly committed to using the official development assistance (ODA) for guidance in future development. DFIDs results estimates show what DFID has achieved in international development between 2015 and 2020. Individual departments that bid for funding are accountable for their own spending and delivery under the given fund. Bilateral ODA is earmarked spend, i.e. Erratic budget processes threaten US foreign aid. Programmes involved providing humanitarian assistance such as immediate relief and emergency food, Nigeria saw the largest decrease in bilateral ODA compared to all other recipients, with spend decreasing from 297 million in 2018 to 258 million in 2019 (the next largest decrease was Pakistan by 26m). The countries within the top 10 remained unchanged from 2018[footnote 25]. The OECD statistics provide ODA breakdowns for DAC donors (including multilaterals). 17 That level of per capita spending exceeded any other OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) country during 2018-21. In 2021, about 743 million pounds was spent on humanitarian assistance such as disaster relief, a . For example, support to the World Food Programmes (WFP) Emergency Operations in Yemen, other bilateral: this is earmarked ODA spent directly by governments or through other delivery partners, such as Non-Governmental and Civil Society Organisations, research institutions and universities. This was driven by increased spending by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) and DFID. Major sectors are ordered from top to bottom by largest 2019 0DA spend. Information on the main definitions and sources used in this publication can be found in Annexes 2 and 3 respectively of the Statistics on International Development publication. In 2019, 97.1% of DFIDs region-specific bilateral ODA went to countries in Africa and Asia (4,224m). The estimate for the UKs EU attribution in 2019 was 983 million compared to 951 million in 2018, EU attribution fluctuates from year to year because the EU works on a 7 year programming cycle and so EU disbursements in a given year can vary. The headline grant equivalent measure of UK ODA for 2019 was 15,197 million, compared to 15,179 million on the cash basis measurement (a difference of 0.1%). It includes all low, lower-middle and upper-middle income countries, except for those that are members of the G8 or the European Union (including countries with a firm accession date for EU membership). This report contains the release of finalised UK ODA spend figures for the calendar year 2019, including: Comparisons between 2018 and 2019 ODA figures are made, as well as trends over the last 5 years (2015 to 2019 inclusive as shown in most tables). This publication is available at https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/statistics-on-international-development-final-uk-aid-spend-2019/statistics-on-international-development-final-uk-aid-spend-2019. 2019: The Americas received 244 million of UK bilateral ODA in 2019, a decrease of 111 million or 31.3% compared to 2018 (Figure 4). It shows: Figure 18: Map of the top 15 highest recipients of total DAC Members bilateral ODA Spend and UKs Share by Country, 2018. In comparison, Norways ODA spend (3.4bn) was roughly an eighth of the United States but its ODA:GNI ratio was 1.02% showing that Norway spends a larger share of its national income on ODA. As of this reporting, it has disbursed over $32 billion. The Development Tracker can be used to explore details of the individual development projects that the UK is funding. The United States is by far the largest single foreign donor. This increased to 115.1 billion for final ODA for 2018 an increase of 0.3 per cent. This is an in-depth investigation of the UKs development systems and policies. Core contributions will fluctuate from year to year in part due to the payment schedules of the receiving multilateral organisation. Other = Other government departments: Department of Health and Social, Prosperity Cross-Government Fund, HM Treasury, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Department for Work and Pensions, Department for Education, HM Revenue and Customs, Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sports, Ministry of Defence, and Office for National Statistics, Department for International Trade. From January 24, 2022, to January 15, 2023, the United States provided around 73.2 billion euros in bilateral financial . In 2016, the UK spent 13.4 billion on overseas aid, in line with the 0.7% target. The DAC sets the definitions and classifications for reporting on ODA internationally. DWP spend also includes ODA-eligible benefits to refugees within the first 12 months of stay in the UK as part of the Vulnerable Persons Resettlement (VPR) programme. This means that in 2016, for example, 7.85% of the UK's total foreign aid budget (ODA), which totalled 13,348m (pdf) that year, was spent on climate-related projects. Information on this spend can be found in the Office for National Statistics Living costs and Food Survey or the Charities Aid Foundations UK giving report. Figure 7 legend: Top 10 Recipients of UK 2019 Bilateral ODA[footnote 14]. Rep.) remains a top 10 recipient of UK bilateral ODA after entering in 2018 due to the increase in Humanitarian Aid spend, which has been the highest sector spend in the country for the last 3 years, South Sudan became a top 10 recipient of UK bilateral ODA in 2019 due to the increase in Health spend, which became the highest spend sector in the country in 2019, while Humanitarian Aid had been the highest sector for the previous 5 years, the amount of UK ODA to the top 5 multilaterals represented 68.7% of total multilateral ODA in 2019. Other Government Departments spent 3,398 million of ODA in 2019, increasing by 434 million on 2018, Home Office spent 452 million of ODA in 2019, an increase of 115 million, or 34.0%, on 2018. We use some essential cookies to make this website work. Wed like to set additional cookies to understand how you use GOV.UK, remember your settings and improve government services. Figure 11 legend: Breakdown of UK Bilateral ODA, 2019. Finally, the Scottish Governments Climate Justice Fund helps tackle the effects of climate change in the poorest, most vulnerable countries, with a 3m budget. DWP pays an annual core contribution to the International Labour Organisation (ILO). , For further analysis on DAC country donors, see the OECD report on donors provisional figures. A report from the International Development Committee said the world's poorest countries were being "short-changed" by the government as the "political . Non-DFID EU contributions include ODA eligible spend in peace, security, democracy, human rights and civil society. Italy is the lowest performing G7 country in the rankings at number 20 while the US, where the administration is reviewing US aid priorities, ranks at number nine. This could have an impact on the recent trends of some recipient countries. Prior to the anniversary, the US was Ukraine 's biggest backer, offering around $80billion (66.8bn) in aid, the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, a global tracker of aid sent to Kyiv, found . DFID spent 11,107 million of ODA in 2019. , Statistics on International Development, Final UK Aid Spend, 2019, p. 18, Figure 5, Figure 18 is based on the provisional 2019 ODA data from all 29 DAC member countries, except the UK for which final 2019 ODA data is used. The majority of non-DFID country-specific ODA was channelled to Middle Income Countries 71.5% (440m to LMICs and 412m to UMICs), LDCs and Other LICs received 339 million of non-DFID bilateral ODA in 2019, this was an increase of 112 million compared to 2018. The opposite pattern emerges from non-DFID contributors, with Africas share of non-DFID region specific bilateral ODA in 2019 increasing (by 8.0 percentage points) compared to 2015, while the share received by Asia decreased (by 10.2 percentage points) over the same period. Private spending or donations made to support developing countries, for example by the public, the voluntary sector or through remittances, are not part of the ODA definition and not covered in this publication.